Strip-Search in High School essay


It would be lawful for head teachers to strip-search their students in order to avoid the smuggling of drugs into school, maintain high discipline levels, and to prevent the entrance of weapons into the school. However, the Supreme Court restricts strip search because it infringes on the student’s privacy, as it is not constitutional, and it is abuse of authority.

High school head masters are lawfully required to strip-search their students in order to avoid the illegal entry of drugs into schools. Alexander & Alexander (2005)point out that drug abuse is becoming rampant among adolescents. Adolescents who might easily sneak drugs into the school mostly dominate high schools. In cases where there is no thorough search, drugs would be sneaked into high schools leading to drug abuse among the youngsters. In addition, there would be a higher effect of peer pressure as more students want to get into drug abuse. The only way to prevent the illegal entry of various drugs into schools would be through strip-searches, which allow for thorough searches. As indicated in New Jersey v. T. L. O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985) case (1985), this means that students would not be allowed to hide such drugs at any point of their bodies because they would be easily retrieved. Strip-searching would allow the headmasters to carry out satisfactory searches among students and gradually eliminate the emerging issue of drug abuse among teenagers. Drug abuse would be gradually eliminated from high schools as most students develop the fear of being arrested and legally dealt with.

Strip-searches would promote discipline in high schools. Most students would adopt a straightforward approach to issues in cases where strip-searches are conducted. The required levels of discipline would be easily achieved in high schools because everything is detected as one gets into the school compound. Safford Unified School District #1 et al. v. Redding (2009) case indicates that materials such as pornographic movies would not be allowed into schools. This means that students would develop some level of self-control in their actions. They would develop the feeling that their efforts counts in the elimination of bad behavior in high schools. Strip searches would ensure discipline as most students fear being embarrassed in front of others. They would be careful in their actions and would not allow emotions to control their steps. High schools would have higher levels of discipline as students perceived to be influencing others by carrying unaccepted materials to schools are identified. They would be gradually eliminated hence leaving behind an environment dominated by focused students. The discipline achieved because of strip-searches would enhance the performance levels in the respective schools. All students in such schools would be focused towards achieving vital dreams in life instead of participating in indiscipline behavior that could lead to their expulsion.

Crimes that occur in school settings would be reduced to a greater level as a because of strip searches. These searches are vital because they restrict students from getting into the schools compound with weapons and other dangerous metals. There have been rampant cases of teenagers attempting to murder others using the weapons, they ferry into schools. With these weapons, some students have the capacity of killing themselves and harming others. This amounts to a crime. The case involving Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton 515 U.S. 646 (1995) reveals that high school principals are legally justified to prevent the occurrence of illegal cases in their schools by strip-searching students. This means that weapons that are likely to be used for wrong doings among students would be eliminated. Cases relating to murder and other undesirable cases would be eliminated from high schools. Strip-searches would ensure that the dangerous weapons are confiscated and forwarded to the appropriate authorities for investigations. Students found in possession of such tools are then presented to authorities’ sob that the law takes its course.

However, the Supreme Court is against the strip-searching exercise. It asserts that strip searches are unconstitutional. For instance, in the case between Safford Unified School District V. Redding, the Supreme Court claimed that the school officials violated the Fourth Amendment by strip-searching students. This amendment prohibits individuals from unreasonably searching others. Thus, this was in total violation of the constitutional rights of students. The judges observed that, in the case, the school officials did not bother to check other areas in order to establish the truth. They did not consider checking lockers and even the bags that had been carried by the students. According to Safford Unified School District #1 et al. v. Redding (2009), the hurried strip-searches violated the requirements of the constitution because there were no reasonable grounds to establish the worthiness of the search on the students. This was only meant to intimidate and embarrass students in front of others because the search did not abound any signs of pills. The student was not even aware of the pills. The constitution was also violated because there were no apologies even after the search failed to produce the perceived pills. This is an unconstitutional way of dealing with individuals because their dignity is lowered.

According to the Supreme Court, strip-searches infringe on the privacy of students. The Court held that a student has a legitimate right to privacy. Concerning this, high school principals do not have a right to infringe on these rights. In the case between New Jersey vs. T.L.O, the Supreme Court asserted that the schools authorities had gone too far by ordering the student to strip naked. The interest of students should be put into consideration even in cases where the authorities suspect that they could be in possession of unwanted materials. The respect of the privacy on either side would help eliminate cases of schools indiscipline such as strikes. Students would not be seen on the streets protesting mistreatment and harassment in schools. There would be efficient running of all the institutions, as students would feel respected and acceptable in the school environment. The Supreme Court advises the concerned authorities to continue advising students on matters relating to drug abuse and other issues. Cases that could result from strip-search would be significantly reduced.  In line with privacy, the search on students should be based on reasonability rather than putting into consideration probable cause of the search. There should be substantial grounds to establish that the particular student should be extremely searched before the commencement of any search.

In conclusions, high school principals are legally justified to conduct strip-searches on their students. This would help reduce and ultimately eliminate drug abuse that is becoming common among adolescents. With the thorough search, drugs would not be sneaked into schools and the pressure, to take such drugs would definitely drop. Higher levels of discipline would be maintained in high schools because of strip-searches. Students would behave accordingly in order to avoid the embarrassment that may arise because of the search. Thus, they take due care to behave in the appropriate manner. Illegal materials such as pornographic movies would not be allowed into schools and discipline would be revolutionized. Crimes would go down in high schools because principals would restrict the entry of weapons and other dangerous tools that could cause harm to other students. However, the Supreme Court restricts the strip searches to a great measure. It asserts that it is an unconstitutional move that is meant to intimidate students and embarrass them. Such searches should not be conducted on students because they violate the provisions of the constitution. Strip search is undesirable because it interferes with the privacy of an individual.

Strip-Search in High School essay

Related essays

  1. Mid-Term
  2. The United Nations Children's Fund
  3. The Works Progress Administration
  4. Liquidation